Theoretical physicist ???????? Jeffrey criticised the existing accepted thinking on urban theory before coming with a group of constants defined the relationship between city size, the output of the citizens (any city is multiplied in size it to any person, income, innovation, and more grew 15%, similarly negative social actions of crime, pollution ...). Previously he had found a similar efficiency in biology where larger ????????? was less energy per unit mass that must be the life of him.
It is this track record in reducing the scope of the problem a simple set of rules & constraints which are so impressive. Way for theoretical physics students about solving for x-sense of minimalism that deals with the seemingly chaotic environment tour into understandable, predictable systems and data. Is raw data visualisation is the most pure form.
And then we infographic humble.
A bit like urban theory at present far from true data-driven approach has morphed out of the original good intentions into sub-genre seemingly as gratification for viral community design moving no more mkmcotz of bread crumbs anecdotal as root. Who cares if it is after all more of the same font looks cool.
Unconvinced?
An overview of the last effort of popular information is beautiful. The title leads us to believe that a message about debt buried vizoalim animated. Well, it is a matter for discussion. There are a bunch of figures expressed in terms of blocks of Tetris with my going amount. But it is a maze of data without any sophisticated way of giving context or connection beyond the one dimensional data a data "vs" systematic quantities.
For example, the cost of credit versus debt even Africa. One is many times more than the other. Perhaps worth some more analysis, if only to see if there are some basic relationship holding those from numbers together. But this is actually the end of the movie, one of which was launched with everything from Tesco's revenue to certain net worth guy level annual corporate tax evasion. Clever bit probably gets all these amounts together nicely as a random slot Tetris blocks ….
So what? Where is the link? What is linking to them? Where is it?
So here's an animated gimmick that tells us a bunch of unrelated numbers and surprisingly enough not to link them. The medium of that is quite graphic. The data is truly private? Web streaming instead only managed to dilute the information "to mean any random factoid? I'll be honest, there are people there that describes themselves as data geeks and I doubt that they have already touched on the basics of mathematics since GCSE.
By the way I am in no way select Brak case above, it just happened to be the first I found. Full Web of similarly album ' infographics ' which offer little by way of stating really people ...
No doubt has an important place for real data graphics popular science today. Peer through a sea of non-existent ' insight ' hubris that surround a variable pseudo data more widely circulated. Best graphics can guide the observer no matter what your skill level to take startling array of detailed matter of seconds, and vchochbi allow expression of relationship and context.
We should return to what infographics have been developed for: rich vizoalim of complex data expressed in that provides a simple relationship that bridges the viewer free plain randomness, narcissistic load.